Monday, October 17, 2011

First "Tintin" Reviews Are Raves

via Dark Horizons - General Feed by Dark Horizons on 10/16/11

While it's still two months off for those us living in Australia or the United States, Europe is about to get Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson's "The Adventures of Tintin" dropped on them in coming weeks.

Over the weekend though, the embargo was lifted on press reviews and the word is very good, even from the usually tough French critics who would be more than happy to skewer Spielberg and co. if the film made a mockery of the beloved Belgian comic. Premiere calls it a masterpiece. Jeuxactu gives it 5/5, L'Express a 4/5. Cinemateaser gives it a 4.5/5 and says it contains "irresistible humor, a love for cinema, experimental (narrative and visual) techniques and a genuine respect for Hergé".

Amongst the Brits, a rather verbose review in Empire gives it a 4/5 and has high praise for Andy Serkis' performance as Haddock, the animation, the action, and more with special love for all its throwbacks to classic European cinematic style. They call it a film that shows "the romance of old-school cinema, conjured by the slick synthesis of CG wizardry".

The few problems they have with it are the same ones that Total Film mentions in their 3/5 review (the most negative one thus far). The big issue is that it might be too manic, the pace is so fast and the focus is so much on going from one action set piece to the next that the story never finds the time to quieten down or give us a "strong emotional hook" - making it more of a fun escapist adventure for kids than something more emotional in their words.

They do however highly praise "an up, down and all-around chase sequence executed in one impossible, continuous shot that brings the excitement to a dizzy peak". Numerous reviews praise Spielberg's virtual camera work and the "sublime opening credits".

Update: The trades have come in with raves, Variety calling it "a rollicking return to action-adventure form, especially after the disappointment of "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull"… blessed with a smart script and the best craftsmanship money can buy, Spielberg has fashioned a whiz-bang thrill ride that's largely faithful to the wholesome spirit of his source but still appealing to younger, Tintin-challenged auds."

The Hollywood Reporter says it maintains a "compact narrative that never takes itself too seriously… [it's] a good ol’ fashioned adventure flick that harkens back to the filmmaker’s action-packed, tongue-in-cheek swashbucklers of the 1980s".

On the flip side two UK papers weren't as enamoured. The Guardian gives it a 2/5 and says "while the big set pieces are often exuberantly handled, the human details are sorely wanting" and spends much of the review talking about how the animation fails to convey the expressions and humanity that Herge was able to impart with the comics.

The Telegraph gives it a 3/5 and has the same complaint about the film's lack of humanity, calling the overall movie "a perfectly decent animated adventure, comparable to the better output of DreamWorks if perhaps not Pixar... this is less an adaptation of Hergé’s writing than a kind of airless pastiche of it." He adds that the motion capture was a big issue - "however much more successful the technique is here than it has been elsewhere, crucially it’s not successful enough".

Further reviews are expected to be forthcoming shortly.

"Avengers" Sequel Plans Discussed

via Dark Horizons - General Feed by Dark Horizons on 10/16/11

Marvel Studios made a big splash with "The Avengers" over the weekend at the New York Comic Con. Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Tom Hiddleston, Clark Gregg and Cobie Smulders showed up with producer Kevin Feige to present new footage and answer questions reports Heat Vision.

The big scene shown was the first meeting between Bruce Banner (Ruffalo) and Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) where she essentially recruits him to be a part of the team and had armed men hidden and on standby in case his rage transformed him into The Hulk. There was also a scene with Tony Stark and Loki.

The sub-plots and story contrivances to bring about "The Avengers" in Marvel's previous few films has often been cited in reviews as the Achilles heel of the likes of "Iron Man 2," "Thor" and "Captain America: The First Avenger". With this coming out, there's been thought that Marvel might lay off on the cross-overs for a little while.

That doesn't seem to be the case however with Feige saying that the upcoming "Iron Man 3" will "be the first of what we sort of refer to as phase two of this...saga that will culminate, God willing, in Avengers 2."

Joss Whedon is working on the movie in the edit room and it's presently too early to tell what the runtime will be. The teaser trailer for the project debuted on Apple back on Tuesday and was reportedly downloaded more than 10 million times within 24 hours.

‘The Thing’ Review: Hopelessly Devoted to John Carpenter

via /Film by Russ Fischer on 10/16/11


The word ‘uninspired’ is an easy shortcut to communicate an impression of unpleasant mediocrity, and so it gets thrown around a lot. It is also the perfect term for The Thing, the new film by Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. that acts as a prequel to John Carpenter’s 1982 film of the same name. Uninspired, right off the bat: no one could even bother to tack a subtitle onto this movie, much less an entirely new name.

The Thing ‘11 is slavishly devoted to the ‘82 effort, which has evolved from box-office flop to a revered horror icon. Ostensibly a prequel, this film is so heavily attached to the old, like a pre-surgery Belial, that I’m not sure there was ever a chance it could grow a personality of its own. It appropriates some of Ennio Morricone’s score for the ‘82, noticeably the low bass throb of the original main theme, but it might as well adopt Olivia Newton John’s AM radio hit ‘Hopelessly Devoted to You’ as the real theme. In short, The Thing ‘11 is a fan film on a studio budget.

A recap for those who haven’t seen Carpenter’s movie: the staff of a Norwegian research station in Antarctica uncovers an actual flying saucer long-buried in ice. They also find, buried nearby, what appears to have been the lone occupant: a spiny, many-legged, insectoid alien thing. Turns out this thing isn’t quite dead. Worse, it has a brutal hunting methodology: it takes the form of its prey. As team members are killed and impersonated by the alien paranoia and violence take over, and the research station succumbs to uncertainty as the survivors attempt to do away with the creature.

Let’s get some praise out of the way. As you’d expect from a fan film, a superb amount of effort has been given over to replicating details glimpsed in Carpenter’s film, and these sets generally look quite good. Which is to say that they look like a drab, possibly functional research base in the early ‘80s. The image is a bit more glossy than Dean Cundey’s cinematography from the early ‘80s, sure, because this was shot digitally rather than on film. I can live with that.

I’m also accepting of the blend of CGI and practical effects that is used to give motion to this version of the shape-shifting alien. The first time we see an imitate human explode into alien limbs and tendrils the effects are overly glossy and digital, but eventually things settle down. The alien effects feel as if some key member of the VFX team is a big fan of EA’s Dead Space video game series (which, in turn, bears influence from The Thing ‘82) and that’s OK, too. This version of the alien behaves differently from the one in Carpenter’s film — it is more aggressive, and quicker to reveal itself — and I could have been accepting that if the behavior had suggested something specific. Instead, it appears only to be tied to modern studio filmmaking.

Finally, the casting generally works — I believed quite a few of the Norwegian crew members, and Joel Edgerton is good as a gruff and practical not-quite stand-in for Kurt Russell. Mary Elizabeth Winstead is the standout as a grad student paleontologist who turns out to be the most adaptable and open-minded person on the base. John Carpenter’s film is cast with a visually diverse group of character actors, and this doesn’t match his inspired choices in that realm, but that wouldn’t be much of a problem if the script for this prequel has any characters you’d be able to remember after the credits roll.

As that last line implies, the rest of this film is a morass of strange and simply bad choices. Because the conclusion of this story is established by Carpenter’s movie — spoiler: everyone dies — there isn’t room to create any significant tension. And because the ‘82 film features a walkthrough of the research base that acts as this film’s primary location, van Heijningen and screenwriter Eric Heisserer have to organize all the action around establishing the stuff seen twenty years ago.

The need to conform to Carpenter’s movie could be a creative challenge, or creatively confining. In this case, it has been interpreted as the latter. It would be short-sighted to say there’s nothing this story could possibly accomplish. The Thing ’11 could tell any number of tales that might break away from the structure of Carpenter’s film. Heisserer’s script does not tell any of those stories. It does more or less the same thing Carpenter did: introduces the alien into a group of people, who then have to devise a means of telling human from alien before getting bumped off. It doesn’t follow exactly the same path, but close enough for most purposes. There are more people in the base this time, which means we get to know each one to a lesser degree.

The cast is good enough that even with the weak and generally indistinguishable bunch of researchers written into the script, the movie isn’t particularly bad for the first two acts. It doesn’t have any truly compelling scenes, and we don’t learn anything that we didn’t already know from watching the Carpenter film, but the people on screen are working so diligently to sell the action that I bought into it for a while.

And then we leave the Norwegian base and end up on the alien ship. If you remember the detour onto the Predator’s craft in Predator 2 you can more or less imagine what you’ll see here — little more than an empty shell, with some seemingly under-rendered technology at the center. I can’t for the life of me figure out how the alien we’ve seen managed to create or pilot this craft. I can imagine all sorts of possibilities and I guess The Thing ‘11 imagines it is being clever and generous by giving me such things to ponder. (The most obvious idea: that the alien took the shape of whatever did pilot the craft — but we might have guessed that in ’82, as well.)

Here’s where we almost see something new, something that could belong specifically to this film. Instead it’s an empty dodge, a blank attempt to add epic scale to a story that is specifically built around claustrophobia. That in turn leads to one of the most awkward endings I can recall in recent years, where The Thing ’11 tries to wrap up its own small story before remembering to serve up scenes allowing it to dovetail with Carpenter’s. We’re left with a film that falls so easily into the obvious metaphor: an imitation that is effective for a time but can’t hold it’s shape long enough to really fool anyone.

/Film score: 4 out of 10

Shawn Levy to direct Pinocchio Prequel

via /Film by Russ Fischer on 10/17/11

Briefly: Shawn Levy‘s Real Steel was the box-office champ for a second weekend in a row, so it’s no surprise to see him set up with a new high-concept project. Fox has picked up a script called The Three Misfortunes of Geppetto, by Michael Vukadinovich, which is a prequel to the story told in Pinocchio. (Didn’t Fox learn anything from the returns and reviews for The Thing this weekend?)

Shawn Levy is now attached to direct the film, called “a fresh way into the Pinocchio story.”

Deadline reports, saying that Levy is still likely to next direct the Max Landis-scripted Frankenstein, also at Fox. So, two new takes on classic stories from Levy, possibly one right after the other. (I’m far more interested in seeing the stop-motion animated version of Pinocchio that Guillermo del Toro is producing.) And this is a different film from the live-action Pinocchio that Warner Bros. has been developing, with a script by Bryan Fuller.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Review: Real Steel

via Dark Horizons - General Feed by Dark Horizons on 10/10/11

As I first watched the trailers for this film, I could just imagine a Hollywood pitch meeting taking place in a table at Spagos or The Brown Derby or some such local. During a power lunch wherein a small appetizer could cost as much as an average person's daily salary, someone says in eureka fashion: "How about 'Rock 'em, Sock 'em Robots' meets 'Rocky'"? "That's a brilliant idea," chimes a producer, "let's go for it! (in a cheeky bit of faux cleverness in reference to 'Rocky V')".

And yes, "Real Steel", directed by Shawn Levy (the "Night at the Museum" films) and produced by the likes of Levy, Steven Spielberg and Robert Zemekis (among others) as a Dreamworks/Disney collaboration, does heavily crib from both concepts but, instead of feeling like a rehash of what has been seen before, seems fresher than it should. This is due to a combination of the screenwriting talents of John Gatin with story by Dan Gilroy and Jeremy Leven (based on a story by Richard Matheson [I Am Legend]) and the cast, headed by Hugh Jackman ("X-Men Origins: Wolverine", "The Prestige") and Dakota Goyo ("Thor").

It's an underdog story. Boxing with robots has supplanted human boxing as the dominant sport sometime in the relatively near future. The story heavily homages (or is that "steals from"?) the first Rocky film in many ways, and in one key sequence virtually (literally and figuratively) recreates classic choreography (according to IMDB, "Rocky IV"). Charlie Kenton (Jackman) is a once promising boxer now down on his luck robot boxing participant who is constantly on the run, whether to find a new robot to bring him back on top, evade the many creditors who hound him, relationships with women, or himself.

In the midst of this, circumstances bring him into an unwanted contact with his born out of wedlock son, eleven year old Max (Goyo), who harbors deep resentment towards his absentee father. Things change when Max discovers a discarded sparring bot (named "Atom", a symbolic name due to his stature compared to other fighting bots in the film as well as its underdog status). Both father and son engage in a journey to find common ground as they work the boxing circuit to find legitimacy and validation both within and outside the ring.

The actors deliver powerful performances. In the hands of other actors, absentee father Charlie could have come across as despicably deplorable. However, it's Jackman's innate nature that keeps the audience's sympathy (which may actually be counter productive to the character development, as the further "into the moral depths" a character falls, the greater the redemption if achieved). He brings an everyman's sensibility and carries the weight of failed hopes and dreams well, though mixed with a hopeful, never give up tenacity even when he knows his plans won't work. He's all bluster and hype in front of others, but he evinces a vulnerability that lets the audience know its all an act.

However good Jackman is, his considerable star power does not solely carry the film. In fact, the majority of the burden falls upon young Goyo as his illegitimate son, Max. Last seen in Kenneth Branagh's "Thor", Goyo has much more screen time and makes the most of it. By now, the know it all, more mature than the adult child is an exasperating cliché; most of the time portrayed by youngsters who are equally as exasperating. However, Goyo straddles the line between precociousness and annoyance naturally because he plays the role as a boy, not an adult in a child's body. Thus he keeps the audience sympathy all throughout the film; no mean feat.

Arguably, if this role was miscast the film would fall apart. This is not to say that the supporting players, such as Evangeline Lilly ("Lost") as Bailey Tallet, the daughter of Charlie's boxing trainer, current owner of the family gym and implied previous love interest, Hope Davis ("About Schmidt") as Max's aunt Debra who seeks sole custody of him, the ever-reliable James Rebhorn ("Scotland, PA", "The Talented Mr. Ripley"), as Marvin, Debra's milquetoast but affluent husband, Karl Yune ("Memoirs of a Geisha"), who plays creator of ultimate battle bot "Zeus" (read "Apollo" Creed from "Rocky"), and Kevin Durand ("Lost", "X-Men Origins: Wolverine") who plays an ex-boxer who had defeated Charlie in the past and to whom Charlie owes money, are in any way deficient.

Their performances help build up and support the main conflicts, truly making this film an ensemble piece. However, the linchpin is the relationship and chemistry between Jackman and Goyo. One believes that their characters are father and son (and cut from the same mold) and Goyo allows for subtle nuances in Jackman's character in terms of the latter's development (a prime example of this involves a slight running gag involving hamburgers). They are the heart and soul of the film, thus keeping it from becoming a faux Transformers.

And speaking of Transformers, Michael Bay should go back to school and take a course in "Robot Filmmaking 101", with "Real Steel being the required curriculum. After all, one of the main problems with the big screen "Transformers" is that both the Autobots and Decepticons looked virtually interchangeable with some minor exceptions (Optimus Prime being one); just a mass of whirling gears and cogs held together by virtually indistinguishable exoskeletons. In this film, each robot has its own unique form with a personality somewhat reflective of that form.

The crowning jewel here is Atom itself. All the robots are a combination of CGI and actual robots, so it is a credit to the special effects team and puppeteers that we have a rare instance of the CGI Gumby" Hulk), have lacked; including Transformers. To say more about Atom itself would give away a major spoiler that was left somewhat underdeveloped, but suffice it to say the audience comes to care about the robot's fate as much as the human actors whose care it is in.

The direction by Levy is tight, as is the editing by Dean Zimmerman. There are very few spots that lag on longer than they're supposed to. Levy keeps the performances rooted in reality without going over the top in some cases. Further, he builds up the storytelling and the stakes and hits the appropriate beats to build to a satisfying crescendos and conclusions.

In the theater I went to, through two climatic fight sequences, despite the fact that on an intellectual level everyone knew they were watching a CGI display, the actions, emotions and stakes were so high that when the fights came to their respective conclusions the audience reacted, clapped and cheered as though this were a real time event; something that was absent from all the Rocky forays since its first sequel (perhaps having much to do with the fact that, in many instances, the fights were choreographed by boxing great Sugar Ray Leonard) or any other underdog fighting film, for that matter.

The film's score was by Danny Elfman, who yet again reaches out from his quirky comfort zone and produces a score reminiscent of the more traditional, feel good scoring efforts of the 1980s by frequent Spielberg and Zemekis collaborators John Williams and Alan Silvestri. Elfman's score, while not particularly cohesive in terms of its themes, does give the film its own distinct identity while recalling the types of scores from a bygone era.

This feels more like a film that should have been a summer release; perhaps the producers felt that it would have been lost amidst that season's other sci-fi release. They needn't have worried. PG-13 for its violence and language, this film comes closer to being a family film without being excessively cloying.

It's a fun film full of pathos, action, and humor with themes of rapprochement and redemption. It's more than robots beating each other. Its about emotional distances being closed and finding the courage to continue fighting even when the fight is all but lost. The best sci-fi is rooted in relatable human drama, and this film should be counted among the best. In terms of its entertainment value as well as the messages it conveys and bang for the box office buck, "Real Steel" is the real deal. -- Paul Anthony Llossas (Americanculturecritic.com)

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Louis Hunter of 'The Secret Circle' knew his character Nick would be killed off

 
Louis Hunter of 'The Secret Circle' knew his character Nick would be killed off
October 14, 2011 - The Secret Circle star, Louis Hunter, said he knew all along that his character Nick would be killed off.While it was quite a shock to fans that one of the main characters bit the dust so...

Friday, October 14, 2011

Joe Cornish Approached For Possible ‘Attack the Block’ Remake, Spin-Off, and/or Sequel

 
Joe Cornish Approached For Possible ‘Attack the Block’ Remake, Spin-Off, and/or Sequel
Published on /Film | shared via feedly

Joe Cornish‘s insanely entertaining sci-fi-action-comedy Attack the Block was one of the best features I saw this summer, and at just 88 minutes, it was also one of the shortest. Though the brief runtine helped keep the story — about South London hood kids defending their housing complex from an alien attack — taut and fast-paced, it also had the downside of leaving me wishing I could’ve spent a little more time with Moses and the gang.

Now it seems my wish may actually be coming true, but I’m not sure how to feel about it anymore. Cornish revealed in an interview at New York City Comic-Con that he has in fact been approached to do a possible American remake, sequel, and/or TV spin-off of his original film, though he was careful to stress that any potential follow-ups were still in the “very early days.” More details after the jump.

IFC broke the story, based on a conversation with the director. “We’ve had approaches for a remake and a sequel. We’ve had approaches for a TV show to spin off it,” said Cornish. “But it’s very early days, you know. So it’s not out of the question but very early days, and I’d certainly like to do something different for my next thing if I get a chance to do a next thing.”

If a sequel were to happen, however, Cornish already has a couple of ideas lined up — as does star John Boyega. Cornish outlined one possible plotline he’d discussed with the actor:

[Boyega] keeps coming up with amazing ideas. He has this image of a bigger alien attack on London, as if the wave we saw in ‘Attack the Block’ was just the [first] wave and there’s another wave of bigger creatures. And he described to me this image of Moses leading a whole army of hood kids across the Thames, next to the houses of Parliament… No, his image was even better. He had an image of Moses on a police horse. You know the police in London who have those horses they use in riots — somehow Moses has got onto one of those horses. So he’s on a horse leading this army of South London kids across the river to take on this bigger wave of aliens. So yeah, it’s really fun to think of stuff like that and think of what we could do.

Who knows if Cornish will end up using that scene, but it sounds fun. I would absolutely love to see Moses leading a big charge while atop a police horse.

I’m less sure how I feel about the TV spin-off, as I’m having trouble envisioning it, but it’s the remake I really feel conflicted about. My knee-jerk reaction is to be against it, since the first movie was such a delightful gem that I don’t see the point in trying to recreate it. But then again, not all remakes are bad, so I suppose I should withhold judgment until the project develops further.

Attack the Block hits Blu-ray and DVD October 25. Head over to our previous story for a list of its special features.